IMMEDIATE PERSONAL INTENT
Bring me dinner. Take me home. Find somewhere quiet. A proxy carries a specific human request into action.
As more action is delegated to AI agents, robots and automated institutions, the central design problem is not autonomy itself. It is whether human intent survives the delegation.
THESIS
01 / WHAT COUNTS AS INTENT?
Human intent exists at several timescales. Some intentions are immediate requests. Others persist for years, belong to communities, or defend the interests of people who are not currently present.
Bring me dinner. Take me home. Find somewhere quiet. A proxy carries a specific human request into action.
Protect my privacy. Prefer accessible routes. Do not increase my debt. The instruction survives beyond one task.
Keep drinking water safe. Make public buildings accessible. Keep parks public. Reduce dangerous air pollution.
Preserve biodiversity, climate stability, cultural memory and future options even when the beneficiaries are not yet present.
THE CITY ALREADY DOES THIS
Society already builds systems that keep a decision operating when the people who made it are absent. AI makes those persistent intentions capable of sensing, negotiating and acting continuously.
We do not want pathogens in our drinking water.
Not every valuable piece of land should be privately monetized.
Physical ability should not determine whether someone may enter.
Some things should survive even when nobody is standing there defending them.
Safety should persist even when no individual remembers every failure mode.
Knowledge should remain accessible beyond the purchasing power of one person.
02 / SOCIETY AS HARNESS
Agent harnesses surround models with tools, permissions, memory, approvals and recovery. Proxy Society generalizes the same idea to companies, buildings and cities: the environment itself should decide what autonomous actors may do.
How does my agent preserve my intention while acting without my continuous supervision?
How does an organization, building or place constrain many proxies according to persistent human intentions?
How does society observe outcomes, verify them against public goals, adjust rules and keep humans able to intervene?
LOOP ENGINEERING / CIVIC SCALE
A clean-air mandate, for example, can move from an occasional regulation into an active loop: observe pollution, identify causes and affected people, act through permitted systems, verify outcomes, adjust, and escalate politically consequential trade-offs to humans.
Healthy air within democratically established thresholds.
Sensors and public data reveal actual exposure, not only modeled averages.
Permitted interventions change traffic, construction, enforcement or incentives.
Did exposure actually fall, and for whom?
Change the intervention when the outcome diverges from the intention.
Return value conflicts and high-impact trade-offs to legitimate human decision-making.
CONFLICT IS THE SYSTEM
Hard boundaries: dignity, due process, accessibility, privacy, bodily safety.
Executable prohibitions and obligations that constrain agents regardless of optimization pressure.
Clean air, conservation, public safety, sustainability, resilience and public access.
Building rules, neighborhood agreements, institutional missions and community priorities.
The preferences and mandates of the person who delegated the task.
Emergency conditions can temporarily alter normal permissions with explicit accountability.
The delegated task creates pressure toward speed and convenience.
The local harness constrains the delivery route. The robot goes around or below rather than through.
03 / ARCHITECTURE OF DELEGATED INTENT
Architecture has historically assumed that the person who wants something is also the body moving through the building. Proxies break that assumption. A second circulation system can emerge for delegated action while human space becomes more deliberately human.
High-speed autonomous circulation can move goods without turning human streets into machine traffic corridors.
Small underground logistics networks can treat delivery as utility infrastructure rather than road traffic.
Buildings can distinguish human arrival, service arrival and delegated arrival, each with different permissions.
Dedicated vertical circulation can move robots and goods without competing for human elevators and corridors.
Secure lockers, refrigerators, waste ports and handoff chambers can move objects across a boundary without granting full entry.
Doors, rooms, elevators and services can expose state and permissions digitally so a proxy understands where it may act.
Spatial thresholds can encode not only where a proxy may enter, but whose authority it carries, for what purpose and for how long.
Some places can deliberately limit proxy activity to preserve quiet, play, intimacy, ecology or unmediated human presence.
INTENT-AWARE PLACES
Machine-readable architecture should not only tell a robot where the elevator is. It can tell the proxy what this place is trying to preserve and how that changes what actions are acceptable here.
A fast delivery mandate does not automatically outrank a place designed around human safety and ecological health.
Emergency access may legitimately override ordinary circulation restrictions while remaining logged and accountable.
The operational goal may be to prevent action rather than optimize throughput.
A proxy may cross a lobby threshold without receiving permission to cross the apartment threshold.
WHY SUSTAINABILITY CHANGES
Markets already give powerful actors persistent representation. Clean air, groundwater, biodiversity, urban trees, dark skies, silence, resilience and future generations often have weaker representation. Proxies could continuously defend human-created mandates around those interests.
I01CLEAN AIR
I02CLEAN WATER
I03GROUNDWATER
I04SOIL HEALTH
I05BIODIVERSITY
I06URBAN TREE CANOPY
I07DARK SKIES
I08PUBLIC SPACE
I09ACCESSIBILITY
I10CULTURAL MEMORY
I11CLIMATE STABILITY
I12LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE
04 / EXISTING PIECES
Robot-ready buildings, underground logistics, elevator APIs, machine-readable building models, agent harnesses and loop engineering already exist as separate fields. Proxy Society connects them through one question: whose intention is being carried into the world?
NAVER built a robot-ready high-rise with ROBOPORT, a robot-only vertical circulation system running from B2 to the roof. It is a direct precedent for architecture designed around non-human circulation.
NAVER LABS ↗Pipedream runs autonomous robots through underground pipes and frames its network like urban utility infrastructure. Peachtree Corners launched an almost one-mile real-world system in 2023.
PIPEDREAM ↗Elevator APIs already let robots travel autonomously between floors. Schindler also exposes access restrictions by elevator, floor and time, an early form of spatial permissions.
SCHINDLER ↗Kyung-Eun Hwang and Mohan Rajesh Elara propose a five-level framework for robot-ready buildings across intelligence, infrastructure, architectural planning, accessibility, observability and safety.
BUILDINGS 2026 ↗NIST is developing standardized machine-readable semantic models and building digital twins so automated systems can understand building components, relationships, data and control points.
NIST ↗A 2026 United Nations University report treats the agent harness as a runtime governance layer around models, tools, memory, permissions, approvals, interruptions and recovery.
UNU 2026 ↗Loop engineering formalizes iterative goal, action, observation and adjustment. Proxy Society asks what happens when that logic expands from software tasks to institutions, cities and public goals.
IBM 2026 ↗Policy as code separates what an AI proposes from what a system permits. That distinction becomes foundational when autonomous action crosses organizational, civic and physical boundaries.
IBM 2026 ↗05 / RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Q01How can a human intention remain legible after it has been decomposed across multiple agents, robots, organizations and physical spaces?
Q02Which intentions should behave as hard constraints, which as goals, and which as preferences that can be negotiated?
Q03How should a building know whose authority a proxy carries, what that authority permits and when it expires?
Q04Can places carry persistent intent, such as protect biodiversity, preserve quiet or guarantee public access?
Q05How can collective and intergenerational interests remain represented when commercial actors have faster and more powerful proxies?
Q06What must remain interruptible, reversible and appealable when society increasingly operates through autonomous loops?
Q07How do we preserve disagreement and democratic change instead of freezing today's values into permanent machine rules?
Q08When should architecture separate human and machine circulation, and when should they deliberately meet?
PROPOSITION
The model does not govern society. Society governs models, agents and robots through rights, institutions, protocols, architecture and continuously revisable human decisions. Maintaining human intent is the thesis. Robot tunnels, proxy entrances and machine-readable cities are physical consequences.
CONTINUE TO THE ARCHITECTURE OF PRESENCESEE SOCIAL PERMEABILITY